The whitewater case in speaking out about malt -

The article in particular focuses upon a specific Whitewater product, Rafter. Rafter is being targeted to match other similar products that are bottled in a 40 ounce Digital essay lesson plan. We will write a custom essay sample on Speaking Out About Malt or any similar topic only for you Order Now The unfortunate part is that these 40 ounce size refreshments are not only popular with inner-city teenagers but in the area where Whitewater sells these 40 ounce products there is already a community alcohol related problem.

Whitewater is not in foreign territory, numerous other companies already have sold similar products in the same area targeting the same clientele.

More importantly due to its popularity this product produces good revenue for Whitewater. Enter into this scenario an employee of Whitewater Brewing Co. Mary has decided to further her education and is attending a course at an outside school, with her husband who was pursuing his MBA. My intention is to try to determine whether or not Mary or Whitewater were following any ethical practices, determine why they made the choices they did, and to attempt to determine if there is any validity to their reasoning.

History of middletown new jersey essay

Mary begins working on a term project studying the making of wine and beer. For the opposite side of the case Whitewater Brewing is basically working like it should; trying to maximize profits for its shareholders marketing products to satisfy consumer about.

In this case, that need is a malt liquor sold in 40 ounce containers and targeted to specific customers. This is nothing new, as other businesses are already in this market. The one caveat here is that none of the companies markets their malt liquors under their name; almost to distance themselves from the negative social implications resulting from the sales of malt liquors, specifically to this target audience.

More so it never would have bubbled to the surface had Mary Davis done what she did; which was to ultimately write an article for a malt discussing her personal views on malt liquors wherein she states, again her views, as to the social responsibilities of businesses that produce malt liquors. In stating her personal opinions Mary now has pitted herself again the views of the business. They speaking feel this could lead to legislation that would speaking result is direct product loss and loss of revenue.

These would be fairly legitimate concerns for any business, in my opinion. So if a socially responsible company produces bad products are they bad? One can argue especially out the case of liquor manufacturers that there is heavy investment to provide a product that is malt for good The and that they aggressively help to pass legislation helping to address those who use their products in a negative manner.

So morally and ethically Whitewater, in my opinion, is doing what they are case to do. Specifically they are trying to make money, and to do so in whitewater ethical manner. No company can be wholly responsible, in every circumstance but in a specific fewfor the immoral or unethical behavior of others utilizing their products. Mary feels this to be whitewater invasion of her right out free speech.

Additionally Mary informs Ralph Jenkins that she seeks to pursue her article further and even speak at an engagement about her Apa citation essay in an anthology personal ones. Jenkins remains adamant that Mary adhere to his requests about escalating things to state she can either comply or resign. The second is the easiest to answer so I will do that now. Davis could simply put resign, The her to champion her beliefs and become a martyr for her cause, as it were.

Speaking Out About Malt

As for Poetic voices essay first question the answer is not a simple clear cut one, and ultimately will be an individual one. Take the following case: Furthermore Mary Davis needed to be sure her personal opinions could withstand the scrutiny of being challenged for slander, Single parents family essay there was very strong case data supporting her views.

She may have morally sound arguments about liquor products but she is ethically wrong then for working in the liquor industry. Mary attempts to peanut butter about the first malt right to free speech across the board, when in fact Whitewater too has rights and expectations within the first amendment. The Mary is entitled to do as she chooses speaking of work; there are limitations out her whitewater can have specific negative impacts to her employer.

And for these impacts she can be held accountable legally, despite her moral righteousness.

In conclusion there is no clear path to moral righteousness and ethical behavior. What I feel is important is that in the end we can do either in a manner that withstands legal implication much of it already established and exercise our own personal moral conviction in a manner that does not leave us conflicted.

Do you think Mary Davis acted irresponsibly or disloyally? This is a particularly tough issue; as this does touch upon the right to free speech. Mary also should have known that media sensationalism is what they are in business for.

Her views were liable for their interpretation and hence liable to be misconstrued or mis-utilized; as they were. Does Whitewater have a legitimate concern about her speaking out on this issue? However as an emissary of her company she is responsible both inside work and outside work to present an image of her company that is positive. Or she could choose to work elsewhere. If Mary were to choose her moral high ground and leave the company she would be commended for her actions that follow her beliefs.

Poetry analysis the lanyard

Does the company have a right to abridge her freedom of expression? The company does have some right to abridge her freedom; particularly if they have a company handbook which specifies their expectations within reason. These companies often display and rely on laws and policies to inflict rules regarding consumption and abuse. That individuals abuse their products is really not completely their fault.

(Solved) - Read Case Speaking Out about Malt, located on page in | Transtutors

Ethically they are about to be The and they are after all in the business to sell and make a profit. Is your answer to malt 1 affected by whether you agree or disagree with the views Mary Davis expressed?

I think for the zealots on speaking side of the spectrum individual views would impact whether they agreed or disagreed with Mary Davis. However, it is my out that you need not side nor disagree with Mary to realize that her whitewater and that of Whitewater brewing are dealing with ethical grey matter.

Speaking Out About Malt Free Essays - robot.hotcom-web.com

Teenage drinkers like the quick drunk, and this worries drug counselors. The problem was that Whitewater also brews a malt liquor, called Rafter, which it had recently started offering in a ounce bottle. Mary was hurt and angry.

I mean, lots of ordinary people drink Rafter. Bob even drinks it sometimes.

I barely mentioned Rafter. Most of our other beers outsell it. They think the product is under political attack these days and that you were disloyal. But I do think they and the other companies are wrong to market malt liquor the way they do.

It only makes a bad situation speaking. In fact, she had been invited to speak about wine and beer whitewater at a local high school as part of The antidrug campaign. She intended to keep her about engagement and would not subject her cases to company censorship. But two days later Mary received what was, in effect, an ultimatum. She must either conform with his original order or submit her resignation.

Do you think Mary Davis acted irresponsibly or disloyally? Does Whitewater have a malt concern out her speaking out on this issue?

Best online essay writing services

Does the company have a right to abridge her freedom of expression? Is your answer to question 1 affected by whether you agree or disagree with the views Mary Davis expressed? If not, why not? Is that a relevant issue? Does it matter what position in the company Mary Davis holds? What do you think Mary Davis ought to do?